State v. Project Principle, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the new requirement that existing Texas public school teachers pass the TECAT constituted a licensing requirement and not a change in the contractual relationship between teachers and school districts
• holding that the new requirement that existing Texas public school teachers pass the TECAT constituted a licensing requirement and not a change in the contractual relationship between teachers and school districts
• stating that laws are deemed retrospective and constitutionally prohibited if their retrospective operation destroys or impairs vested rights
• stating that laws are deemed retrospective and constitutionally prohibited if their retrospective operation destroys or impairs vested rights
• license to teach \confers no vested rights\
• license to teach “confers no vested rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).