State v. Producers' Refining Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the merger rule in an action to confirm an arbitral award under the New York Convention
• rejecting the interest rate provided for in an arbitration award because it specified that it would accrue “from the date of 12 this Award until full payment,” but did not specify it “post-judgment”
• “[C]ourts have required the parties or arbitrators to unambiguously express their intent to replace the federal rate for the post-judgment period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).