State v. Procella
Citations
- 105 La. 518
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Where the accused in a criminal trial considers that the conduct or language of the prosecuting officer is improper, he should invoke the action of the trial judge. Railing to do so, he will not be heard to complain in this court.</p> <p>2. Jurors, though not permitted to impeach their own verdicts, are competent to testify in rebuttal of charges of misconduct.</p> <p>3. Where there is neither bill of exception, nor assignment of errors, no alleged error in the charge can be considered, unless, upon its face, the charge complained of is glaringly unjust and erroneous.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Verdugo-Urquidez and rejecting Fourth Amendment challenge to Section 702 surveillance where, despite marriage to United States citizen, defendant lived abroad at time of offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Monroe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.