Superior Court of Delaware· 9/13/1961
State v. Pritchett
Citations
- 173 A.2d 886
- 53 Del. 583
- 3 Storey 583
- 1961 Del. Super. LEXIS 109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It has long been established in this State that any conviction of any criminal charge may be sustained on circumstantial evidence.”
- “it has long been established in this State that any conviction of any criminal charge may be sustained on circumstantial evidence.”
- conviction for operating motor vehicle can be based on circumstantial evidence; there was no blood alcohol test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-05-06· cited 112×
- Gallagher v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1964-11-30· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. HiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-07-15· cited 45×
- State v. CannonHawaii Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 42×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-12· cited 39×
- Jacobson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 37×
- Prudhomme v. HultsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1967-03-15· cited 30×
- Kirby v. State, Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-01-25· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-07-26· cited 14×
- State v. PurcellSuperior Court of Delaware· 1975-03-26· cited 13×
- State v. LariviereConnecticut Appellate Court· 1963-08-26· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. CavallaroMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-04-13· cited 5×
- Down Under, Ltd. v. Delaware Alcoholic Beverage Control CommissionSuperior Court of Delaware· 1989-10-31· cited 5×
- People v. CeschiniCriminal Court of the City of New York· 1970-05-14· cited 5×
- State v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1965-09-03· cited 3×
- State v. WymbsHamilton County Municipal Court· 1984-01-31· cited 2×
- El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ramos GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1965-05-19· cited 2×
- State v. ByrneSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-04-27
- State v. ByrneSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-05-08
- Serrano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2021-09-29
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rickards v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1950-12-06· cited 74×
- State v. WebbArizona Supreme Court· 1954-09-27· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. UskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1928-03-02· cited 54×
- Smethurst v. Proprietors of Independent Congregational Church in Barton SquareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-01-03· cited 52×
- State v. BiterSuperior Court of Delaware· 1955-12-28· cited 36×
- People v. DomagalaNew York County Courts· 1924-10-08· cited 32×
- Nathan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1918-01-02· cited 28×
- Waite v. StateNebraska Supreme Court· 1959-10-23· cited 22×
- State v. BaumgartnerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1952-09-15· cited 22×
- Bradam v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1950-12-09· cited 21×
- State v. DamoorgianNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1958-12-01· cited 20×
- Coulson v. Shirks Motor Express CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware· 1954-08-11· cited 18×
- State v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1954-07-06· cited 17×
- Holland v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1954-09-28· cited 15×
- State v. WaltersSuperior Court of Delaware· 1952-05-14· cited 14×
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa· 1957-10-15· cited 14×
- State v. RaySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1926-05-04· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1927-11-30· cited 10×
- State v. RobertsDelaware Court of Oyer and Terminer· 1910-10-03· cited 10×
- State v. BuckinghamSuperior Court of Delaware· 1957-08-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.