State v. Price
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3790
Syllabus
Admission of evidence Evid.R. 705 and 703 expert-witness testimony must be based on facts in evidence Evid.R. 702(C) expert-witness testimony must be based on reliable scientific, technical, or other specialized information manifest weight of the evidence. Because there was evidence presented at trial that stains from the defendant's car's floor mats contained blood, it was proper for expert witnesses to testify about blood on the floor mats. Expert-witness testimony regarding hypotheticals was based on reasonable degree of scientific certainty. Defendant's convictions for murder and associated offenses were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant's convictions are affirmed.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. SageOhio Supreme Court· 1987-07-08· cited 1,978×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-05-23· cited 1,198×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 530×
- State v. RicheyOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-12· cited 380×
- State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-15· cited 233×
- State v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-08· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.