State v. Price
Citations
- 124 La. 917
- 50 So. 794
- 1909 La. LEXIS 564
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law (§ 1020*) — Appellate Jurisdiction — “Pine Actually Imposed.”</p> <p>Costs follow sentence, but are no part of the “fine actually imposed,” within Const, art. 85, limiting the criminal jurisdiction of the Supreme Court where a fine is actually imposed.</p> <p>2. Criminal Law (§ 1020*) — Appellate Jurisdiction — Limitation by Amount op Fine — “Fine.”</p> <p>The word “fine” in its ordinary acceptation has the distinct meaning of a pecuniary penalty, and has that restricted meaning in Const, art. 85, limiting the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in cases where a fine is imposed, and hence the forfeiture of the right to conduct a barroom, pursuant to section 7 of the Gay-Shat-tuck law (Act No. 176, p. 236, of 1908), imposed in addition to the fine prescribed by section 6 for its violation, forms no part of such fine, the amount of which determines jurisdiction of an appeal in a prosecution thereunder.</p> <p>For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, vol. 3, pp. 2810-2818.]</p>
Judges: Sty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Frazier v. TerrillArizona Supreme Court· 1946-12-09· cited 19×
- Ex Parte MorrisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-06-24· cited 17×
- State v. RugonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-09-19· cited 16×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-07-07· cited 15×
- Xenia v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 1941-07-03· cited 8×
- Shope v. Alabama F. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1915-11-25· cited 6×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.