Hawaii Supreme Court· 4/10/1974
State v. Price
Citations
- 521 P.2d 376
- 55 Haw. 442
- 1974 Haw. LEXIS 118
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “ ‘the mere fact that a suspect is under arrest does not negate the possibility of a voluntary consent’ ”
- stating that \`the mere fact that a suspect is under arrest does not negate the possibility of a voluntary consent'\
- in the context of a search, holding that voluntariness is a question of fact
- in the context of a search, holding that voluntariness is a question of fact
- “[W]hen the accused is directly asked whether he objects to the search, there must be at least some suggestion that his objection is significant or that the search waits upon his consent.”
- “[W]hen the accused is directly asked whether he objects to the search, there must be at least some suggestion that his objection is significant or that the search waits upon his consent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Levinson, Kobayashi, Hawkins, Ogata, Vitousek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GanalHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-05-08· cited 124×
- State v. PattersonHawaii Supreme Court· 1977-11-29· cited 57×
- State v. TrainorHawaii Supreme Court· 1996-10-22· cited 54×
- State v. KaleohanoHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-10-07· cited 46×
- Balogh v. BaloghHawaii Supreme Court· 2014-08-11· cited 40×
- State v. Yong Shik WonHawaii Supreme Court· 2015-11-25· cited 40×
- State v. KearnsHawaii Supreme Court· 1994-02-09· cited 38×
- Nakamoto v. FasiHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-11-06· cited 36×
- State v. TsukiyamaHawaii Supreme Court· 1974-08-30· cited 34×
- In re J.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-06· cited 8×
- In Re JMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-06
- State v. KINIHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-07-14
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 560×
- Robert William Gorman v. United States of America, Edward Terrence Roche v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1967-06-29· cited 124×
- Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1965-03-18· cited 95×
- Emil Schoepflin and William Smith v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1968-01-02· cited 59×
- Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation CenterNinth Circuit· 1971-09-13· cited 39×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Dennis M. Lundergan, Relator-Appellant v. Daniel McMann Warden of Auburn Prison, Auburn, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1969-08-29· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.