State v. Prew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ORS 136.432 did not prevent the trial court from suppressing police officer’s testimony based in part on videotape allegedly obtained illegally under ORS 165.540, because the legislature intended to impose a foundational requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).