Skip to main content
· 2/15/2024

State v. Prettyman

Citations

  • 544 P.3d 1059
  • 2024 UT App 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that district courts have inherent interest in 11 managing their dockets without being subject to noncompliant litigants
  • explaining that less drastic alternatives were considered when the district court tried alternatives and warned the plaintiff that failure to comply would result in dismissal
  • noting that the rule of liberal construction is “particularly important” in 5 civil rights cases
  • noting discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad where court has afforded plaintiff one or more opportunities to amend his complaint
  • affirming 7 || district court’s dismissal of a pro se plaintiff's complaint for failing to comply with a court 8 || order
  • affirming dismissal of pro se § 1983 action when plaintiff did not 1 each factor is not required by the district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.