Skip to main content

State v. Preston

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 1042

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by overruling appellant's Crim.R. 32.1 post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Appellant should have raised his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal. The trial court also did not err by dismissing appellant's petition for post-conviction relief for lack of jurisdiction. The petition was untimely and did not satisfy the untimeliness exception. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.