Supreme Court of South Carolina· 10/13/1986
State v. Pressley
Citations
- 349 S.E.2d 403
- 290 S.C. 251
- 1986 S.C. LEXIS 430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- because the trial judge allowed repeated references to appellant’s submission to a polygraph examination, the jury instruction to disregard the polygraph results could not cure the prejudice to appellant
- repeated references to a polygraph examination could not be cured by an instruction for the jury to disregard the testimony where'it was shown that appellant confessed immediately after taking the examination
- “Evidence regarding the results of a polygraph test or the defendant’s willingness or refusal to submit to one is inadmissible.”
- where, on direct appeal, the Court found reversible error based on repeated references to the appellant's submission to a polygraph examination and the evidence that the appellant confessed immediately after taking the polygraph
- where, on direct appeal, the Court found reversible error based on repeated references to the appellant’s submission to a polygraph examination and the evidence that the appellant confessed immediately after taking the polygraph
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory, Ness, Harwell, Chandler, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ThriftSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 72×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-02-08· cited 56×
- Commonwealth v. MendesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-12-11· cited 38×
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 25×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 17×
- State v. ChambersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1995-03-24· cited 15×
- Bruno v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-12-03· cited 5×
- In the Interest of Robert R.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-05-22· cited 4×
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-11-14· cited 1×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.