State v. Presley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relevance of sleep talk not established because of failure to demonstrate nexus between child’s vocalization and alleged incidents
• relevance of sleep talk not established because of failure to demonstrate nexus between child’s vocalization and alleged incidents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Purcell v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 31×
• State v. Beden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-08-04· cited 12×
• State v. Beaty
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 8×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-30· cited 6×
• In Re Interest of Jamie P.
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-11-10· cited 4×
• Commonwealth v. Almeida
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-04-13· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Carr
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-09-30· cited 26×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-12-12· cited 7×
• Hager v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-23· cited 4×