Ohio Supreme Court· 4/19/1989
State v. Prescott
Citations
- 42 Ohio St. 3d 65
- 537 N.E.2d 204
- 1989 Ohio LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A writ of replevin * * * is a remedy sought in a civil action contesting the right to possession of personal property.”
- “Where the action is for the purpose of regaining possession of the property it is an action in rem, and when damages are sought to assuage wrongful detention the action is in personam.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Miller, Moyer, Nick, Res, Sweeney, Third, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 205×
- State v. CasalicchioOhio Supreme Court· 1991-04-03· cited 73×
- Brown v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-25· cited 8×
- INTERN. FIDELITY v. Prestige Rent-A-CarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-24· cited 3×
- State v. CourtOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-23· cited 2×
- Risner v. Ohio Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Sixth District, Huron County· 2017-09-29· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,276×
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 909×
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 720×
- Sensenbrenner v. CrosbyOhio Supreme Court· 1974-01-30· cited 16×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 1983-12-21· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.