State v. Premone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a police \officer's authority to possess a package is distinct from his [or her] authority to examine its contents\ (quoting Walter v. United States, 447 U.S. 649, 654 (1980))
• refusing to apply the inevitable discovery doctrine where the State argued it could have obtained information by way of a search warrant but had not taken A-0121-23 15 any steps to do so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).