· 10/11/2023
State v. Preist
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3702
Syllabus
Consecutive Sentencing - Supported by Record
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that police cannot reinitiate interrogation even where defendant has consulted with counsel in the interim
- stating that police “may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present”
- requiring cessation of interrogation until counsel arrives upon request for legal representation
- police may not interrogate suspect who has asserted Fifth Amendment right to counsel, unless counsel is present or the suspect initiated the communication
- “Whatever the ambiguities of our earlier cases on this point, we now hold that when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present....”
- Fifth Amendment right to counsel may be waived through defendant's voluntarily initiation of communication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.