Skip to main content
· 10/11/2023

State v. Preist

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 3702

Syllabus

Consecutive Sentencing - Supported by Record

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police cannot reinitiate interrogation even where defendant has consulted with counsel in the interim
  • stating that police “may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present”
  • requiring cessation of interrogation until counsel arrives upon request for legal representation
  • police may not interrogate suspect who has asserted Fifth Amendment right to counsel, unless counsel is present or the suspect initiated the communication
  • “Whatever the ambiguities of our earlier cases on this point, we now hold that when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present....”
  • Fifth Amendment right to counsel may be waived through defendant's voluntarily initiation of communication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.