State v. Powelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s consent was involuntary because the officers made it clear to him that if he failed to consent, he would be detained
• holding that unlawful seizure of defendant resulted in the tainting of his consent
• where officers told the defendant that he could either consent to a search or be detained and threat to detain was unlawful, the defendant’s ensuing consent was not voluntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).