Skip to main content

State v. Powell

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4286

Syllabus

The trial court's denial of indigent defendant's request for expert funding in a postconviction review of a capital case was a final, appealable order, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion. The court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a new mitigation trial because Hurst v. Florida, ___ U.S. ___, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), does not render Ohio's death penalty scheme unconstitutional.

Judges: Mayle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.