State v. Powell
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8669
Syllabus
The observation and removal of Appellee's pigs from a pen on his property were justified under the open view exception and the exigent circumstances doctrine, since the pen was not within the curtilage of Appellant's residence, and since the pigs had inadequate food, lack of water, and temperatures were below freezing. Judgment reversed and the matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court· 1987-04-20· cited 1,336×
- Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1973-06-20· cited 296×
- Cornelius Fullbright v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1968-04-30· cited 82×
- United States v. HatfieldTenth Circuit· 2003-06-25· cited 62×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-06· cited 23×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-08-28· cited 17×
- State v. GordonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.