State v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the premise that H.P. was incapacitated fails, the conclusion that defendant was denied the right to confront and cross-examine her must fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1995-07-25· cited 277×
• State v. Harper
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-09-14· cited 18×
• State v. MacKey
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-12-17· cited 14×
• State v. Blue
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 14×
• State v. Phelps
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-08-26· cited 12×
• State v. Boyer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-01-02· cited 11×
• In the Interest of Kierst v. D.D.H.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-03-31· cited 11×
• State v. Kelso
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-02-05· cited 10×
• In the Interest of: A.B. v. Juvenile Officer
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2014-11-12· cited 8×
• State v. Shatto
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-04-03· cited 7×
• State v. Burke
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1990-10-16· cited 7×
• State v. McKee
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1993-07-08· cited 7×
• State v. Patton
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-07-30· cited 5×
• State v. Zamora
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-03-26· cited 5×
• State v. Crossland
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-13· cited 3×
• State v. Long
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1997-12-04· cited 3×