Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 3/13/1981

State v. Potter

Citations

  • 627 P.2d 75
  • 1981 Utah LEXIS 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an instruction stating that \specific intent\ is not required to \violate the law but merely an intent to engage in acts or conduct that constitute the elements of a crime\ was appropriate for an aggravated assault charge (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • discussing jury instruction that stated defendant did not need “specific intent to violate the law”; noting that this instruction applied to charge of third-degree aggravated assault
  • discussing jury instruction that stated defendant did not need “specific intent to violate the law”; noting that this instruction applied to charge of third-degree aggravated assault

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maughan, Stewart, Wilkins, Crockett, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.