Skip to main content

State v. Post

Citations

  • 783 P.2d 487
  • 109 N.M. 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that, in reviewing the sufficiency of the 8 evidence, the appellate court looks at all evidence admitted, including wrongfully 9 admitted evidence
  • recognizing that, in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, the 7 1 appellate court looks at all evidence admitted, including wrongfully admitted 2 evidence
  • recognizing that, in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, the 16 appellate court looks at all evidence admitted, including wrongfully admitted 17 evidence
  • holding that the defendant’s incriminating statement should have been suppressed because detectives continued questioning the defendant after he invoked his right to counsel and without any re-initiation of contact by the defendant
  • remand for trial rather than dismissal appropriate where evidence disallowed on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bivins, Donnelly, Minzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.