State v. Portis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The judicial process in revocation hearings need not mirror the judicial process guaranteed to defendants in criminal trials; at a revocation hearing, a court possesses greater flexibility and is not bound by the same strict rules of evidence and procedure.”
• “The judicial process in revocation hearings need not mirror the judicial process guaranteed to defendants in criminal trials; at a revocation hearing, a court possesses greater flexibility and is not bound by the same strict rules of evidence and procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. James
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2002-05-29· cited 21×
• State v. Carr
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-20· cited 11×
• State of Arizona v. Eddie Brian Carr
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-09-20

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Stotts
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 63×
• State v. Smith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-26· cited 39×
• State v. Petralia
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-18· cited 19×
• In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-04-25· cited 13×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-19· cited 11×
• State v. Snider
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-07-23· cited 8×