Connecticut Appellate Court· 12/12/1995
State v. Porter
Citations
- 39 Conn. App. 800
- 668 A.2d 725
- 1995 Conn. App. LEXIS 512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even in light of Daubert, polygraph evidence is inadmissible due to questionable accuracy
- even in light of Daubert, polygraph evidence is inadmissible due to questionable accuracy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 165×
- State v. JohnSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-11· cited 139×
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-12-07· cited 117×
- State v. DuntzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-07-28· cited 81×
- State v. SaurisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 81×
- State v. GomezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-04-13· cited 51×
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-07-15· cited 40×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-07· cited 36×
- State v. ReisConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-02-01· cited 21×
- State v. SummervilleConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-01-05· cited 19×
- State v. RuffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-03-29· cited 17×
- State v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1992-06-09· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.