State v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Failure to suppress evidence obtained in violation of the privacy act is prejudicial unless, within reasonable probability, the erroneous admission of the evidence did not materially affect the outcome of the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Christensen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 75×
• State v. Kipp
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-02-06· cited 40×
• State Of Washington v. J.k.t.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-12-30· cited 9×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-05-24· cited 5×
• State v. Constance
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2010-03-08· cited 5×
• State v. Christensen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-01-31· cited 3×