State v. Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proximity to illegal drugs, together with other corroborative evidence tending to show guilt, is sufficient to establish the dominion and control over the drugs necessary to constitute constructive possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-14· cited 62×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-03-07· cited 56×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-04-18· cited 51×
• State v. Paine
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-17· cited 39×
• State v. Vermillion
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-07· cited 27×
• State v. Kiehl
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-09· cited 4×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Green
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
• State v. Ng
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 225×
• State v. Partin
  Washington Supreme Court· 1977-08-18· cited 222×
• State v. Callahan
  Washington Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 191×
• State v. Theroff
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 180×
• State v. Baeza
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-10-20· cited 82×
• State v. Theroff
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-03-18· cited 78×
• State v. Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-12-30· cited 77×
• State v. Spruell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-03-26· cited 64×
• State v. Bruton
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-04-22· cited 64×
• State v. Amezola
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-17· cited 38×
• State v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-10-23· cited 16×
• State v. Casbeer
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-20· cited 12×