State v. Pope

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court incorrectly told defendant minimum sentence was five years when correct number was twenty
• “the use of the words ‘appropriate relief’ was intended to give the superior court full use of its discretion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Morley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-03-12· cited 173×
• State v. Miller
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-05-26· cited 139×
• State v. Turley
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-05-22· cited 102×
• In Re the Personal Restraint of James
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-01-15· cited 80×
• In Re the Personal Restraint of Palodichuk
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-12-07· cited 66×
• State v. Boone
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-11-12· cited 41×
• In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-08-31· cited 24×
• In Re the Personal Restraint of Baca
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-19· cited 16×
• State v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-20· cited 8×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-27· cited 6×
• State v. Pierre
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-05-30· cited 5×
• State v. Morley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-16· cited 5×
• State v. Gray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-07· cited 4×
• State v. Elmore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-11-01· cited 4×
• State v. Whittey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-11-06· cited 3×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Rhonemus
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-23