State v. Poole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant who presented motion to remove for cause to district court judge he sought to remove had not waived his right to seek prohibition by bringing motion before challenged judge instead of chief judge
• holding no partiality based on the mere fact that a trial judge considering a suppression motion related to a search warrant is the same judge that issued the warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Minnesota v. Alton Dominique Finch
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-07-08· cited 24×
• Comiskey v. District Court in & for the County of Pueblo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1996-10-28· cited 8×
• State v. Laughlin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1993-11-23· cited 8×
• Cano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-09· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Schumacher
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-08-08· cited 64×
• State v. Cermak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-05-18· cited 59×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-10· cited 10×
• State v. Ketterer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-03-04· cited 7×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-05-09· cited 7×
• State v. Velishek
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-25· cited 6×