Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/4/1991
State v. Poole
Citations
- 583 A.2d 265
- 321 Md. 482
- 1991 Md. LEXIS 4
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, pursuant to Rule 4-243, \the trial court should summarize the essential parts of the agreement\
- holding that once a court accepts a guilty plea, it is bound by the provisions contained in the plea agreement
- holding that once a court accepts a guilty plea, it is bound by the provisions contained in the plea agreement.
- holding that when a court has accepted a guilty plea and has committed itself to be bound by the provisions contained within the plea agreement, the judge cannot refuse to carry out the bargain that induced the plea
- holding that when a court has accepted a guilty plea and has committed itself to be bound by the provisions contained within the plea agreement, the judge cannot refuse to carry out the bargain that induced the plea
- holding that the trial court was bound by a plea agreement it had accepted under which Poole provided the police information relevant to the prosecution of certain criminals and a police officer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, McAuliffe, Adkins, Blackwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cuffley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-28· cited 47×
- Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-06· cited 31×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-03-13· cited 29×
- Solorzano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-19· cited 23×
- Baines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-28· cited 23×
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-27· cited 7×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-22· cited 7×
- State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-09-29· cited 5×
- Duran v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-05-09· cited 2×
- Y.Y. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-27· cited 1×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-30
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-31
- Lee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-03-28
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- People v. McConnellNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-02-20· cited 156×
- State v. BrockmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-05-21· cited 96×
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-17· cited 86×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-26· cited 60×
- State v. KuchenreutherSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-05-22· cited 42×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-10-14· cited 34×
- Allgood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-03-24· cited 32×
- Wynn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-07-19· cited 24×
- State v. WenzelSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-06-17· cited 23×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-12-14· cited 22×
- United States v. Jerry Wayne Thomas and Sherry Lynn WatersTenth Circuit· 1978-09-15· cited 16×
- Brent v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-15· cited 12×
- Epps v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-02· cited 12×
- McCormick v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-01-11· cited 8×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-11-03· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.