State v. Pond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declaring that “the notice requirement is a condition precedent to the admissibility of HRE Rule 404(b) evidence”
• declaring that \the notice requirement is a condition precedent to the admissibility of HRE Rule 404(b) evidence\
• observing that Pond never explained “why he could not have provided earlier notice of the approximate time period of the alleged bad act, as well as the location and the general nature of the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pond
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-09-29· cited 26×
• State v. Kekona
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2009-05-11· cited 2×
• State v. Pond
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-03-10

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Huddleston v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-05-02· cited 2,215×
• State v. Richie
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1998-08-03· cited 243×
• United States v. James Williams
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-05-10· cited 175×
• State v. Nichols
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2006-08-25· cited 164×
• State v. Klinge
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2000-02-04· cited 86×
• Self v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-11-17· cited 57×
• State v. Aganon
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2001-12-20· cited 54×
• State v. Pemberton
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1990-07-10· cited 53×
• Scott v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-12-19· cited 51×
• State v. Kupihea
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1996-01-12· cited 50×
• State v. Augustin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-17· cited 29×
• Hatcher v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 28×
• United States v. Long
  D. Kansas· 1993-03-01· cited 20×