Skip to main content
· 2/16/1983

State v. Pomerance

Citations

  • 434 So. 2d 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if the defendant's automobile was properly seized under the Forfeiture Act \the search of the trunk of the car was a proper inventory search\
  • The Forfeiture Act \nowhere mentions obtaining a warrant; it simply states that an offending vehicle `shall be seized.' We know of no rationale for judicially engrafting onto the statute a requirement that a warrant be obtained.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boardman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.