State v. Pollman
Citations
- 51 Wash. 110
- 98 P. 88
- 1908 Wash. LEXIS 978
Syllabus
<p>Physicians and Surgeons — License—Offenses—What Constitutes Practicing — Advertising as “Dr.” — Statutes—Construction. It is competent for the legislature to prohibit advertisement or the use of the words “Physician” and “Doctor” without first securing a license as a physician, and to provide that such use shall constitute “practicing medicine”; and it is immaterial that the words were used in connection with “Osteopathic and Magnetic” or “Drug-less”, or that the abbreviation “Dr.” was employed in place of “Doctor.”</p> <p>Statutes — Title and Subjects — Sufficiency. The title to an act to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery is sufficiently broad to include provisions making it unlawful for an unlicensed person to call or advertise himself as “Physician” or “Doctor.”</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dare v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-04-07· cited 145×
- Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1911-04-15· cited 27×
- Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court· 1915-03-17· cited 26×
- Waldo v. PoeW.D. Washington· 1926-06-28· cited 9×
- Lathrop v. SundbergWashington Supreme Court· 1911-02-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.