State v. Polk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[V]oluntary intoxication is not an absolute defense but may be considered by the jury in determining whether the intoxication\ negated the requisite mental state.
• “[Vjoluntary intoxication is not an absolute defense but may be considered by the jury in determining whether the intoxication” negated the requisite mental state.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-01-23· cited 176×
• State v. Stasio
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-01-18· cited 46×
• State v. Bauman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-02-27· cited 41×
• State v. Moore
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-04-03· cited 15×
• State v. R.T.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-12-16· cited 15×
• State v. Martin
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-11-10· cited 4×
• State v. Roman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-04-18· cited 3×
• State v. RT
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-12-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiPaolo
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1961-03-06· cited 92×
• State v. Christener
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-07-14· cited 77×
• State v. Maik
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1972-02-22· cited 47×
• State v. King
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1962-05-07· cited 47×
• State v. Polk
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-04-28· cited 14×