Skip to main content

State v. Polizzi

Citations

  • 167 N.E.3d 508
  • 2021 Ohio 244

Syllabus

CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - resentencing law of the case doctrine intervening inconsistent Supreme Court decision R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 apply to individual sentences due process of law sentence vacated de novo sentencing hearing resentence on remand no reasonable expectation of finality vindictiveness R.C. 2953.08(G) R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) sentencing court's findings appellate review consecutive sentences not disproportionate to conduct and danger to public cruel and unusual punishment proportionality review of individual sentences consecutive and lengthy sentences must be reserved for the worst offenses and offenders.

Judges: Cannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.