State v. Poland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a trial court should \articulate[ ] on the record at least some of the factors bearing upon [its] exercise of Rule 403 discretion\
• stating that a trial court should “articulate[] on the record at least some of the factors bearing upon [its] exercise of Rule 403 discretion”
• Trial judge not expected to give complete analysis of why he is excluding evidence under M.R.Evid. 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Forbes
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-05-06· cited 34×
• State v. Mahaney
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-01· cited 30×
• State v. Terrio
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-03-02· cited 22×
• State v. Giglio
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-02-17· cited 19×
• State v. Whitman
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-05-04· cited 16×
• Todd v. Andalkar
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1997-04-01· cited 13×
• Mondello v. General Electric Co.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1994-12-08· cited 11×
• State v. Stack
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-02-16· cited 9×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-01-09· cited 9×
• State v. JOEY F.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-01-05· cited 7×
• State v. Spearin
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-04-10· cited 4×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Simon v. Town of Kennebunkport
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-08-06· cited 20×
• State v. DiPietro
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-10-15· cited 16×
• Page v. Hemingway Bros. Interstate Trucking Co.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1955-03-10· cited 2×