Skip to main content

State v. Ploof

Citations

  • 336 A.2d 181
  • 133 Vt. 304
  • 1975 Vt. LEXIS 389

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • despite violation of inquest’s secrecy provision, suppression of perjurious statement is not appropriate where the defendant seeks to suppress verbal act of perjury rather than substance of statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Smith, Keyser, Baley, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.