State v. Pless

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining the defendant’s confrontation rights were not violated when a chemist, who did not perform the chemical analysis of the seized substance, testified at trial because she provided an independent basis for her opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Romano
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-11-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 1,225×
• Barnette v. Lowe's Home Ctrs., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-04-19· cited 17×
• State v. Pless
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2018-08-07· cited 2×