Skip to main content

State v. Pittman

Citations

  • 690 S.E.2d 661
  • 302 Ga. App. 531
  • 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 381
  • 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding indictment that in one count tracked the generic language of OCGA § 16-14-4(a) and then in other counts included detailed predicate acts was sufficient to withstand special demurrer
  • “The indictment is read as a whole, and one part may incorporate other parts.”
  • \Due process is satisfied where an indictment puts a defendant on notice of the crimes with which he is charged and against which he must defend.\ (citation omitted)
  • “The two requirements of an indictment are that it definitively inform the accused of the charges against him, so that he may present his defense and avoid surprises at trial, and that it protect the accused against another prosecution for the same offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Bernes, Blackburn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.