Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/9/2007
State v. Pitt
Citations
- 159 P.3d 329
- 212 Or. App. 523
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 671
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we generally exercise discretion to review plain error when the erroneously admitted evidence was “essential or critical” to the state’s case
- reversal based on a violation of defendant’s constitutional right to confront witnesses against him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PittOregon Supreme Court· 2012-10-18· cited 80×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28· cited 43×
- State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. S.P.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-20· cited 18×
- State v. NorbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 13×
- State v. Reyes-MauroCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-26· cited 4×
- State v. AlneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 3×
- State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 2×
- State Ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. SPCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-02-20
- State v. HAGGBLOMCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-05-27
- State Of Iowa Vs. James Howard BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.