State v. Pitsurenko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding subject matter jurisdiction was present under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) and denying Sealift’s motion for judgment on the administrative record on the merits of the transferred protest
• determining that the protestor was required to demonstrate that a false statement was made intentionally and that the agency relied on the false statement in order to prove the existence of a material misrepresentation
• involving the fuel efficiency of a tanker in a charter contract with the Navy
• resolving merits of bid protest on transfer
• bid protest over MSC tanker time charter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).