State v. Pitot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that whether defense counsel's representation of two co-defendants constituted a conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel’s performance was best determined in a post-conviction proceeding rather than on direct review
• concluding that whether defense counsel's representation of two co-defendants constituted a conflict of interest adversely affecting counsel's performance was best determined in a post-conviction proceeding rather than on direct review
• stating that \[w]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court\
• stating that “[w]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court”
• stating that “[W]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court.”
• stating that \[W]e ordinarily will not review an issue that was not presented to the trial court.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).