Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/20/2019
State v. Ping
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2458
Syllabus
A bank that reimburses its customer for a financial loss due to forgery or credit card fraud is not a \victim\ for purposes of R.C. 2929.18, and therefore, cannot be awarded restitution from a defendant.
Judges: Klatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. KiserOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-10-28· cited 12×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-23· cited 12×
- State v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-30· cited 11×
- State v. EstesOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 11×
- State v. StumpOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-31· cited 11×
- State v. CrumOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-11· cited 9×
- State v. CartwrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-14· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.