Skip to main content
· 6/7/2002

State v. Pineo

Citations

  • 2002 ME 93
  • 798 A.2d 1093
  • 2002 Me. LEXIS 104
  • 2002 WL 1237836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the defendant failed to raise an argument regarding section 1256(3)(B) to the sentencing court, thereby depriving it of an opportunity to make findings of fact
  • “As the focus on criminal purpose might suggest, all of the caselaw discussing [section 1256(3)(B) ] has dealt with intentional crimes.”
  • noting unintentional crimes have no criminal purpose
  • noting unintentional crimes have no criminal purpose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saufley, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Alexander, Calkins, Levy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.