Skip to main content

State v. Pinder

Citations

  • 126 N.H. 220
  • 489 A.2d 653
  • 1985 N.H. LEXIS 252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s understanding of his right to refuse consent was intervening circumstance
  • statements suppressed as fruit of illegal search where defendant was confronted with illegally obtained evidence, he made statements directly related to that evidence, and there was \no intervening event that would have removed the taint\ from the statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.