District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/22/1996
State v. Pinder
Citations
- 678 So. 2d 410
- 1996 WL 406715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \a defendant must first establish a reasonable probability that the privileged matters contain information necessary to his defense\
- “The Ritchie due process analysis necessarily assumed that the Pennsylvania CYS 1 The defendant asserts that the complainant failed to sufficiently argue in the trial court that our holding in State v. Cressey, 137 N.H. 402, 413 (1993
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Christopher Craig ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-23· cited 173×
- People v. HammonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-07· cited 138×
- State of Iowa v. Jonas Dorian NeiderbachSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-08-23· cited 135×
- State v. Alan S. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2023-05-16· cited 32×
- Nussbaumer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-27· cited 29×
- In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 25×
- State v. FamigliettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 19×
- Gerheiser v. StephensDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-08· cited 12×
- State v. RobersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-17· cited 8×
- State v. KellywoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-12-12· cited 8×
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-06-06· cited 6×
- Katlein v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 6×
- State v. FrommeIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 4×
- In Re Crisis Connection, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15· cited 3×
- J.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-05· cited 3×
- Famiglietti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-01-23· cited 3×
- Pauker v. OlsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-30· cited 2×
- State v. FamigliettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-27· cited 1×
- State v. FrommeIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15· cited 1×
- Webb v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-30
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court· 1974-07-24· cited 4,095×
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 1,807×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- Jaffee v. RedmondSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 915×
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 494×
- State v. KalakoskyWashington Supreme Court· 1993-05-27· cited 133×
- Commonwealth v. BishopMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1993-08-16· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-31· cited 79×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-30· cited 76×
- People v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-06-02· cited 63×
- Goldsmith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-01-12· cited 58×
- People v. FoggyIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-02-11· cited 57×
- Commonwealth v. KennedySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-23· cited 49×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.