State v. Pina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant must show 11 prejudice to successfully challenge a variance of date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ross
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-05-24· cited 20×
• State v. Libero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-05-23· cited 9×
• Local 2238 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Stratton
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 8×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 992×
• Estep v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-02-04· cited 914×
• Poulos v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1953-06-08· cited 343×
• Sicurella v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1955-03-14· cited 156×
• City of Santa Fe v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1964-01-27· cited 64×
• State v. Romero
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-02-05· cited 49×
• State v. Lindsey
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1969-12-05· cited 49×
• State v. Lucero
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-10-09· cited 35×
• Benally. v. Marcum
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-09-10· cited 34×
• State v. Lujan
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1975-04-04· cited 31×
• Chermack v. Bjornson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-11-22· cited 20×
• Leitch v. State, Department of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-03-11· cited 17×
• Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States. Moseley v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1952-10-06· cited 7×
• State v. Salazar
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-03-20· cited 7×