· 7/17/1975
State v. Piland
Citations
- 538 P.2d 666
- 217 Kan. 689
- 1975 Kan. LEXIS 484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- In theft case, “the jury should have been instructed as to the element of value.”
- where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a juiy finding as to value
- where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
- where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
- where value of stolen property is in issue, trial court should instruct the jury with respect to the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
- where value of stolen property is in issue, trial court should instruct the jury with respect to the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fontron, Fromme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.