Skip to main content
· 7/17/1975

State v. Piland

Citations

  • 538 P.2d 666
  • 217 Kan. 689
  • 1975 Kan. LEXIS 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • In theft case, “the jury should have been instructed as to the element of value.”
  • where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a juiy finding as to value
  • where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
  • where value of stolen property is at issue, trial court should instruct the jury regarding the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
  • where value of stolen property is in issue, trial court should instruct the jury with respect to the element of value and require a jury finding as to value
  • where value of stolen property is in issue, trial court should instruct the jury with respect to the element of value and require a jury finding as to value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fontron, Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.