Missouri Court of Appeals· 6/4/1996
State v. Pierce
Citations
- 927 S.W.2d 374
- 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 941
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- an improper jury selection claim was not cognizable because the movant was aware of the issue before the direct appeal, but an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based upon failing to challenge the jury’s selection was reviewed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanna, Lowenstein, Spinden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 2000-01-11· cited 183×
- State v. ColbertMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-08-19· cited 23×
- State v. MaloneMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-16· cited 14×
- Boyd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-10-01· cited 11×
- Wadlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-05-09· cited 2×
- Mark C. Brandolese v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals· 2025-05-27
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Love v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-05-15· cited 73×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri· 1986-10-14· cited 41×
- State v. ReichertMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-05-05· cited 35×
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-04· cited 26×
- State v. BoundsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-06-15· cited 15×
- Forshee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-12-28· cited 13×
- State v. SilcoxMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-05-21· cited 11×
- State v. LightMissouri Court of Appeals· 1994-01-04· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.