State v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence sufficient to show intent to retain and receive stolen property
• evidence sufficient to show intent to retain and receive stolen property
• \The existence of contradictory evidence does not warrant disturbing the ... verdict.\
• \The existence of contradictory evidence does not warrant disturbing the verdict.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Valcarce v. Fitzgerald
  Utah Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 234×
• State v. James
  Utah Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 163×
• State v. Dibello
  Utah Supreme Court· 1989-08-24· cited 90×
• Bruner v. Carver
  Utah Supreme Court· 1996-07-09· cited 24×
• State v. Jamison
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1989-01-09· cited 22×
• State v. Goddard
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-03-09· cited 22×
• State v. Valdez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-12-28· cited 17×
• State v. Cayer
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-06-25· cited 14×
• State v. Taylor
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-04· cited 12×
• State v. Samples
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2012-02-24· cited 8×
• J.W. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2001-06-28· cited 7×
• Cafferty v. Hughes
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2002-04-11· cited 3×
• In Re JW
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2001-06-28