State v. Pierce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have long held that, where service is made by mail and actually reaches the party to be served within the required time, it is equivalent to personal service.”
• “[W]e have long held that, where service is made by mail and actually reaches the party to be served within the required time, it is equivalent to personal service.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stonewall Insurance Co. v. Horak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-29· cited 11×
• In Re the Estate of Kotowski
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-10-11· cited 6×
• Florey v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International
  D. Minnesota· 1977-11-15· cited 5×
• Proetz v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-02-25· cited 5×
• State v. Freitag
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-30· cited 3×
• Kalthoff v. Deere and Company
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-08-16· cited 2×
• City of St. Paul v. Wiplinger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-04-02· cited 2×
• Maki v. Hansen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-03-31· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Van Aernam v. Winslow
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1887-12-13· cited 14×
• Hoff v. Northwestern Elevator Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1913-01-03· cited 14×
• In re the Estate of Bridgham
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-03-21· cited 13×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-04-30· cited 4×
• Holmes v. Second Judicial District Court
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1938-07-07· cited 3×