· 12/17/1974
State v. Pieck
Citations
- 529 P.2d 217
- 111 Ariz. 318
- 1974 Ariz. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that the fact-finder “is not compelled to accept the story or believe the testimony of an interested party”
- “The jury is not compelled to accept the story or believe the testimony of an interested party.”
- “The jury is not compelled to accept the story or believe the testimony of an interested party.”
- “The jury is not compelled to accept the story or believe the testimony of an interested party.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Hays, Holohan, Lockwood, Struckmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.